Well, of course, because we have racism in our DNA as a nation.
Me, I trained to kill what would have been other white people (never had to do it, but I trained my ass off in case it came to that), so I'm not quite sure where you're trying to go with bringing that into this discussion. Killing people, white, brown, purple, whatever, isn't really about science, unless we're now talking about ways to kill people of a variety of colors more efficiently and scientifically.
Science for the sake of science is pretty cool, but winds up getting Tesla'd. It'd be nice if that weren't the case. I'm not sure if there's a really good way to split funding, ROI, and science from each other. The guy who pays the bills is almost always going to want something in return for that funding. I'd bet there's benevolent donors who really do just want scientific progress, but there's a whole lot more people with money and agendas.
the only reason folks even have a term "science for the sake of science" means they lack vision about what science is actually about, and why we should fund it.
there is no such thing as science for the sake of science. there is only solving problem and figuring out how things work. and you never really know what bit of information, or what technology you developed for one thing, will revolutionize another process and change the world. this makes it ALL valuable.
if you have a working fusion reactor for example, you don't give two shits about the sunis, ISIS, or the middle east. they can blow themselves for we care. science leads to economics, leads to politics, leads to fundamental solutions to the problems we have today.
lets talk about a manned mars mission ... sounds like science for the sake of science doesn't it? but what will you have devlop to make that mission work:
1. make fuel from rocks
2. arrate and make barren soil grow food (genetically engineer food to grow there?)
3. conserve and save resources
4. much better solar generation
5. get everyone to work together
these are ALL solutions to VERY real world problems we are having right now. dollars invested in solving such problems, will pay off. and you never know what other applications such technology will produce too.
Last edited by cockerpunk; 10-23-2015 at 02:36 PM.
social conservatism: the mortal fear that someone, somewhere, might be having fun.
The real trick to experimental science is finding experiments that are right on the edge of possibility. Diverting funds from unknown but more easily answered problems to one giant and massively expensive project that's premature in terms of emerging technology is not wise. And you are always diverting funds for big science regardless of how big your budget is; there are innumerable worthwhile but small experiments to do. Subfields like condensed matter, atomic physics and biophysics would not be where they are today had we trudged ahead with the supercollider.
Furthermore, these things are not easy to build. I have good reason to suspect the superconducting supercollider was an overreach in terms of available technology, becoming both a massive drain on other science as well as public support for future science funding.
Uhm...Without explanation, I might as well say you are not a man (even if I have met you in person) and my comment would be equally valid.Also nope, on all points.
As for:But that anti-regulation bit is hystericalThat might actually be where you are both a bit ignorant:regulation is not what stops large scale science research machines in the USA
Companies are starting up and working in Canada, even Toshiba, to work on MSR, ISMR and other small format reactors for heating up oil sands. India is working on Thorium reactors. These novel new reactors are not even being allowed to be built as a test device until the NRC receives hundreds of millions of dollars, and at least 10 years, just for permit to start testing. After that time and money, the NRC might just say no because the NRC is only focused on, and only works with and approves large size LWR. Even our own ORL, which I am less than a mile from as of this typing, is working with China because the US regulatory system mucks them up.The net effect of the regulatory sclerosis in the U.S. is to force companies offshore. TerraPower, the startup funded in part by Nathan Myhrvold and Bill Gates that is focused on a novel machine known as a traveling wave reactor, signed an agreement in September with the China National Nuclear Corp. to build a prototype unit in China. Other U.S.-based startups have indicated their intention to find more nuclear-friendly countries in which to prove their technology. Even the DOE, via Oak Ridge National Laboratory, is collaborating with a Chinese partner: Oak Ridge is working with the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics to build a prototype molten salt reactor.
These companies could raise funds that were reasonable, and a couple have. They just know to not to this work in the USA. Because the USA is saying no to new nuclear development.
Same could be said about newborn stem cell work.
Same could be said about a lot. We (The US Gov) spent $79B on climate change between 1989 and 2009. http://joannenova.com.au/2009/07/mas...nding-exposed/
Why not some other stuff?
Some of these are items that can produce gobsmacking amounts of carbon neutral power, in one design they can use just our waste nuclear fuel and power the world, like the Transatomic design.
http://www.industrytap.com/nuclear-w...r-72-years/417
But they can't do it here, in the US.It’s simple. Take all the nuclear waste in the world, currently 270,000 metric tons, equivalent to the weight of the same number of African elephants, put it into WAMSR (Waste Annihilating Molten Salt Reactor), power the entire world for 72 years, including accounting for the expected rise in energy demand over that time, and get rid of nearly all the world’s nuclear waste, reducing it to the volume of 270,000 baseballs. That’s right, from a metric ton to a baseball! Sounds like science fiction, but it’s not.
So they are looking to do it in Canada and China and India.
Josh Coray
J4 Paintball
Lead Design
www.j4paintball.com