And for the 14th time...
Your observation of the deficit hawks is based on what evidence? Who are the deficit hawks?
Not only that, I suggested the deficit discussion itself was never relevant. It was always smoke in mirrors.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.b16c213c75ab
You need to read my posts again. The fact that you don't understand implicit bias and racism is terrifying. It shows how truly close-minded and intellectually devoid you really are. I defined both and then pointed you to a (explicitly racially biased) racist policy in affirmative action. You ignored it because it doesn't fit your preposterous narrative.
I have said many times now that cronyism is the source. You have never, not once ever, correlated anything that resembles facts as to "how to sell it" is racism. But, considering you don't even understand racism I'm not surprised. Beyond that, calling out this vapor-racism is, at most, a VERY minor, statistically inevitable variable in a multivariate assessment.
You're an immature little kid trying to call out inequality from behind your desk when the reality is you don't care about blacks. You don't care about brown people either. Stop framing them as victims of systemic oppression, which you can't prove, and lets talk about policy. You're a horrible human being for using minorities to push your agenda. You're walking the line of racism.